|
iforgotmine
|
read my profile
sign my guestbook
Name: Joel Country: Canada Metro: Winnipeg Gender: Male
Interests: Long songs, loud songs, quiet songs, reading, copying, you, trying to make the best of a pretty good situation Expertise: Reaching, walking, radio, spending too much time in school Industry: Media
Message: message me
Member Since:
10/14/2005
|
|
| This blog is dying a slow death, so it's time to put it out of its misery. Just don't think about it too much. I said I might blog about Riddley Walker because it is an interesting book. Well... um... it is an interesting book, especially if you like post-apocalyptic myth-making.
If you really think you might miss this, go to Richard Handler's weekly column. It does everything I wanted this blog to do, but much better. Or go to Dave's thing. I might pop up there. And of course the Cockpit Radio Blare, for the full multimedia experience.
End transmission.
| | |
| Blogging is a battle between how much I dislike it and how much I think it benefits me. Guess who is winning these days?
Check out this
I might blog something about Riddley Walker. Very interesting book.
| | |
| I would rather do stop-gap links to things I like than do a new entry. It's too hot to write or read. But not too hot to listen.
Built to Spill is great, and it is nice to see Doug Henning getting work, even though he is dead.
| | |
| Recently I came across a
phrase, and although I can’t remember it exactly, went something like "I don’t
find my identity in that." That phrase
seems odd to me because it is more often than not, completely false. No one "finds" their identity. Identity is something that is "put". For instance, I put my identity in being a
Mennonite, living in Winnipeg, enjoying Woody Allen movies, etc. It seems to me that meaning is far more often
the result of investment than it is discovery.
That anything can be meaningful as long as one is willing put something
into it. And it isn’t always conscious,
but even so it exists. Another personal
example is my fandom regarding the Blue Bombers. In reality, the winning or losing of a
professional sports team in my city matters very little. It might be argued that there is some
cultural or social capital that is developed by the Bombers successes (or lack
thereof), but if I was fired from my job or expecting a child or something that
would inarguably mean more to any sane person, the prospective season of
football means little. And yet,
disappointments in November are crushing to my psyche only because for some
reason I have tied myself to this team. Because
part of my identity is also put in name-dropping, it bears mentioning that this
may be something similar to Nietzsche’s notion of "will to power", consciously
deciding what’s up. If I had the will, I
could sever my connection to the Bombers and their pitiful quarterback
situation would not matter to me.
To get back to what I was
talking about it the last entry, seriousness includes investing meaning in
things that aren’t ridiculous. It
doesn’t mean you can’t invest in something ridiculous (like the history of
cotton candy or whatever), but there should be serious investments made in
things that matter. And while what
constitutes "things that matter" is certainly up for debate, I do not think it
is presumptuous to exclude some things.
It would be smart to exclude, for example, the bullshit on this or any
other blog. Most of the internet, and
the blogosphere in particular, is useless buffoonery. The only ones I think that are worth reading
are ones in which I have invested a real life relationship with.
With all this being said,
it should be noted that the word "find" in the phrase that started this entry,
could be defined differently, but I don’t think people use it differently than
the way they say "I found the green olives in the condiment aisle". It is dangerous to float around the
supermarket of meaning plucking what tickles your fancy. Chances are high that if you are in this
situation, you are shopping while hungry, leading to bad decisions. Decisions like worrying about celebrity relationships,
the marshmallow spread of identity investment.
I propose we take what we choose to care about more seriously, so that it
will inevitably lead to crushing existential guilt and anguish. Of course I am being somewhat facetious, but
also not. So next week: Existential Guilt - is it fake? or is it annoying? | | |
| It was foolish to think I
could keep the Handlers at bay with my friend’s stories and links to great pop
songs, and now I must blog lest I be shuffled off this mortal by one hundred
twenty-one fanatical medieval cult recreationists. They told me not to cheat or shortcut this
time. Five hundred words of original
thought for May 18, or else it’s a shiv in my liver while I sleep. Not that I am left without a choice, but I am
nothing if not cautiously prudent and if extending my life by typing some
bunkum is all it takes… well, let’s just say it seems worth it.
Although there are some
big news items regarding things I like and advocate for on the site (new season
of Radiolab starts today, MD Matheson recording music again,
among others), this needs to be a special entry to make up for time
wasted. While this is not a diary, these
blog entries tend to be inward looking, and this is no different. Lately I am really concerned with seriousness. Clearly someone who believes their blogging
is motivated by serial threats from a retro-cult cannot be serious, but I
assure you that I am. So let me invoke
the most serious icon that I can to provoke some thought. Here is Allen Konigsberg writing about
perspective:
We are a people who lack defined goals. We have never learned to love. We lack leaders and coherent programs. We have no spiritual center. We are adrift in the cosmos wreaking
monstrous violence on one another out of frustration and pain. Fortunately, we have not lost our sense of
proportion.
I would consider that
passage serious, even though if you read it correctly it’s funny. Seriousness and humour are not mutually
exclusive. But I don’t think it’s just
smart and funny. The Colbert Report is
not serious, but Woody Allen can be. Someone
like Thomas Friedman has the appearance of seriousness, but utterly
lacks in this quality. I think I
will come back to making distinctions later.
The whole concept was
inspired by an interview with Marilynne Robinson, and if you read this
with any regularity then you know how powerfully unsurprising that is. Here she is talking about how Barth and
Bonhoeffer were serious people, and she elaborates on the concept:
I have a feeling that there has been a pressure away from
seriousness in much modern thought, as if we could sort of scale reality down
to a size that we are more comfortable dealing with… The loss of seriousness
seems to me to be, in effect, a loss of hope. I think that the thing that made
people rise to real ambition, real gravity was the sense of posterity, for
example -- a word that I can remember hearing quite often when I was a child
and I never hear anymore.
So, to my mind,
seriousness has two main qualities:
honesty; and the ability to attribute to things an appropriate
weight. The problem with either of these
is that they can be difficult, but are more so because things like celebrity
relationships or weekend movie openings are given so much weight. Another difficulty is the lack of pith in
this entry. Let the concept boil another
week. | | |
|