| | Recently I came across a
phrase, and although I can’t remember it exactly, went something like "I don’t
find my identity in that." That phrase
seems odd to me because it is more often than not, completely false. No one "finds" their identity. Identity is something that is "put". For instance, I put my identity in being a
Mennonite, living in Winnipeg, enjoying Woody Allen movies, etc. It seems to me that meaning is far more often
the result of investment than it is discovery.
That anything can be meaningful as long as one is willing put something
into it. And it isn’t always conscious,
but even so it exists. Another personal
example is my fandom regarding the Blue Bombers. In reality, the winning or losing of a
professional sports team in my city matters very little. It might be argued that there is some
cultural or social capital that is developed by the Bombers successes (or lack
thereof), but if I was fired from my job or expecting a child or something that
would inarguably mean more to any sane person, the prospective season of
football means little. And yet,
disappointments in November are crushing to my psyche only because for some
reason I have tied myself to this team. Because
part of my identity is also put in name-dropping, it bears mentioning that this
may be something similar to Nietzsche’s notion of "will to power", consciously
deciding what’s up. If I had the will, I
could sever my connection to the Bombers and their pitiful quarterback
situation would not matter to me.
To get back to what I was
talking about it the last entry, seriousness includes investing meaning in
things that aren’t ridiculous. It
doesn’t mean you can’t invest in something ridiculous (like the history of
cotton candy or whatever), but there should be serious investments made in
things that matter. And while what
constitutes "things that matter" is certainly up for debate, I do not think it
is presumptuous to exclude some things.
It would be smart to exclude, for example, the bullshit on this or any
other blog. Most of the internet, and
the blogosphere in particular, is useless buffoonery. The only ones I think that are worth reading
are ones in which I have invested a real life relationship with.
With all this being said,
it should be noted that the word "find" in the phrase that started this entry,
could be defined differently, but I don’t think people use it differently than
the way they say "I found the green olives in the condiment aisle". It is dangerous to float around the
supermarket of meaning plucking what tickles your fancy. Chances are high that if you are in this
situation, you are shopping while hungry, leading to bad decisions. Decisions like worrying about celebrity relationships,
the marshmallow spread of identity investment.
I propose we take what we choose to care about more seriously, so that it
will inevitably lead to crushing existential guilt and anguish. Of course I am being somewhat facetious, but
also not. So next week: Existential Guilt - is it fake? or is it annoying? |
| | Posted 5/25/2007 3:59 PM - 36 Views - 4 eProps - 4 comments
- recommend
    - recs0
- share
- email
 - sent0
Give eProps or Post a Comment |